Scroll Down

Dixie Sees Destruction Of Its Schools If Segregation Banned; Truman Stand Told

March 16, 1950

Describes that specific southern states actively pursued avoiding integration in all areas of their communities through legal pathways and explains a brief that was critical of integration and maintained the importance of facilities being separate but equal.

Learn More

All-Summer Civil Rights Fight Looms: But Congressional Leaders Failing To Support President

January 18, 1950

Describes the disputes within the House of Representatives as conflicting sides of civil rights legislation began to enter discussion and the efforts from President Truman to keep the House legislation rules the same in order for a fair decision to be made.

Learn More

Moderate Civil Rights Advocated

December 29, 1949

Describes the civil rights efforts of Rep. Brooks Hays of Arkansas who aimed to create equal pay for equal work for Black Americans through the Fair Employment Practices Commission.

Learn More

Editorial Grist: Negro Education Uphold Segregation

August 23, 1956

Describes the perspective of Dr. J.H. White, president of Mississippi Vocational College for Negroes at Itta Bena, who believed that the integration of schools would cause Black students to suffer academically.

Learn More

Editorial Grist: Negro Editor Speaks Out

June 11, 1959

Describes that Percy Green, a Black newspaper editor in Mississippi, believed that the 1954 decision from the Supreme Court was not benefitting Black Americans.

Learn More

Folsom Gives Stand Gn (typo) Segregation, If It Is A Stand

July 7, 1955

Vaguely describes that Governor Folsom planned to pass a bill that would impact segregation in public schools.

Learn More

Editorial Grist: Governor Wallace Leads The Fight

April 2, 1964

Explains the belief that Governor Wallace running for president would bring attention to the opposing side of the civil rights bill.

Learn More

Southerners Make Headway On Ike’s Civil Rights Bill

May 23, 1957

Describes the belief that legislative efforts to end segregation, such as the anti-poll tax, anti-lynch, and FEPC, would ultimately fail because they were anti-south and expresses the idea that civil rights efforts were becoming less popular across the nation.

Learn More

Civil Rights Lost

February 16, 1950

Briefly explains the belief that President Truman’s civil rights program would fail in Congress.

Learn More

Southerners Planning New Policy

February 19, 1948

Explains that southern Democrats were displeased with President Truman’s proposed civil rights legislation and that they planned to protest its progress, as well as the northern Democrat’s decisions, at the Democratic National Convention.

Learn More

FEPC Measure Is Shoved Back

February 23, 1950

Describes that the Senate pushed back voting on President’s Truman’s FEPC anti-discrimination bill and explains that the bill would implement measures to prevent racial or religious discrimination when employing or firing workers.

Learn More

Wallace Resolution Progresses

March 11, 1965

Describes the resolution suggested by Governor Wallace to enable states to choose whether or not to integrate their schools and explains that other southern states began to approve the measure.

Learn More

Patterson to Ask U.S. Congress To Leave Schools Under Local Control

March 19, 1959

Describes the efforts of Governor Patterson and Senator Talmadge to create an amendment that would allow states to decide whether or not to integrate their schools.

Learn More

Race Ruling Is Challenged By 5 Southern States

January 26, 1956

Describes the efforts of Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi, and Virginia in their opposition of civil rights legislation by declaring their rights as sovereign states. Also explains that the states plan to implement incentives to maintain segregation and punishments for those who support organizations such as the NAACP.

Learn More

Questions And Answers Show Up Civil Rights Bill

January 30, 1964

Contains posed questions and answers that analyze the Civil Rights Bill and the inferred definition of discrimination, and the two participants draw the conclusion that the bill is unjust and would result in tyranny.

Learn More